|
Case Study 2 – Facilitating Resistance
to Change
Company A is a substantial transport business with over 5,000 employees and a strong union presence.
A serious accident had resulted in a Judge directing the company to implement various changes to its operations, in particular to a section that controlled scheduling and time-critical movement of vehicles.
New technology and software was to be installed, upgraded from what was effectively a manual operation, and the relevant operations facilities were to be moved to a new location and re-designed.
The facilitator was asked to facilitate the process when the operations team, and unions, refused to accept the changes only weeks before the judicial deadline for compliance, and insisted that an alternative be implemented (which management believed was not a workable alternative). The executives of the company stood to be prosecuted for contempt if the changes were not effected. In addition, another serious accident was a real possibility.
The facilitator met over a 5 day period with a group of key stakeholders, for half a day at a time, using the various elements of the MasterProcess to
match whatever situation arose, and enabling the participants to navigate
their own way through key processes such as identifying positions and differences,
clarifying facts, challenging assumptions, defusing historical and cultural
negativities, building trust in the group, ascertaining the group’s motivational drivers, suspending judgement, putting aside positions, developing alternatives that would work for all stakeholders, getting ‘buy-in’ and
ownership from peers and managers, and finally working together to create
and implement the best solution.
The changes were subsequently implemented, with no resistance and with full co-operation and goodwill of all stakeholders. |